Search this journal:     Advanced search
Essay

Towards adaptive fire management for biodiversity conservation: Experience in South African National Parks

Brian W. van Wilgen, Navashni Govender, Gregory G. Forsyth, Tineke Kraaij

Koedoe; Vol 53, No 2 (2011), 9 pages. doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.982

Submitted: 03 December 2009
Published:  11 May 2011

Abstract

This paper reviews the experience gained in three South African national parks (Kruger, Table Mountain and Bontebok) with regard to the adaptive management of fire for the conservation of biodiversity. In the Kruger National Park, adaptive approaches have evolved over the past 15 years, beginning initially as a form of ‘informed trial and error’, but progressing towards active adaptive management in which landscape-scale, experimental burning treatments are being applied in order to learn. In the process, significant advances in understanding regarding the role and management of fire have been made. Attempts have been made to transfer the approaches developed in Kruger National Park to the other two national parks. However, little progress has been made to date, both because of a failure to provide an agreed context for the introduction of adaptive approaches, and because (in the case of Bontebok National Park) too little time has passed to be able to make an assessment. Fire management interventions, ultimately, will manifest themselves in terms of biodiversity outcomes, but definite links between fire interventions and biodiversity outcomes have yet to be made.

Conservation implications: Significant challenges face the managers of fire-prone and fire adapted ecosystems, where the attainment of ecosystem goals may require approaches (like encouraging high-intensity fires at hot and dry times of the year) that threaten societal goals related to safety. In addition, approaches to fire management have focused on encouraging particular fire patterns in the absence of a sound understanding of their ecological outcomes. Adaptive management offers a framework for addressing these issues, but will require higher levels of agreement, monitoring and assessment than have been the case to date.


Full Text:  |  HTML  |  EPUB  |  XML  |  PDF (1MB)

Author affiliations

Brian W. van Wilgen, CSIR, South Africa
Navashni Govender, Scientific Services, Kruger National Park, Skukuza, South Africa
Gregory G. Forsyth, Centre for Invasion Biology, CSIR Natural Resources and the Environment, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Tineke Kraaij, Scientific Services, Garden Route, South Africa

Metrics

Total abstract views: 2422
Total article views: 6209  

Cited-By

1. Evaluating herbivore management outcomes and associated vegetation impacts
Rina C.C. Grant, Mike J.S. Peel, Hugo Bezuidenhout
Koedoe  vol: 53  issue: 2  year: 2011  
doi: 10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1008

Comments on this article

Before posting your comment, please read our policy.
Post a Comment (Login required)


ISSN: 0075-6458 (print) | ISSN: 2071-0791 (online) Follow us on:

All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license.

©2015 AOSIS (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved. No unauthorised duplication allowed.

AOSIS Publishing | Perfecting Scholarship Online
Postnet Suite #110, Private Bag X19, Durbanville, South Africa, 7551
Tel: 086 1000 381
Tel: +27 21 975 2602
Fax: 086 5004 974

Please read the privacy statement.